2011 Recusal - My attorney files for Judge Thomas Trent Lewis’s recuals/disqualification. In 30yrs practicing law my attorney never filed for a judge to disqualify; however, he took the extraordinary step to disqualify Judge Lewis. My attorney apologized when he departed as counsel, stating he wished he could help me. He felt the situation had become hopeless.
2011 Custody Mediation – The Petitioner is an hour late. After the Petitioner met with the custody mediator, the mediator explained to me there will be not opportunity to reach a custody settlement with the Petitioner. The mediator advised me to read the book “Joint Custody with a Jerk” - http://www.amazon.com/Joint-Custody-Jerk-Uncooperative-Hands/dp/0312584202 I plead to the mediator for help and she states the only thing she can do for me is recommend an evaluation (checking a box). ADR has virtual no influence in the court, only a judge can decide your children’s fate - someone with no professional child, or family training.
2011 Evaluation – No shock, Judge Lewis orders the Petitioners evaluator to perform the evaluation. The evaluator reviews Judge Lewis’s order and finds the order absurd and modifies the order to provide my family and I reasonable time with my daughter.
2011 New Custody Order – Judge Lewis accepts most of the evaluators custody recommendations even though they were similar to my 2010 custody request for modification (see 2010 timeline) – the request he denied. Although I finally had weekends and 3 day holidays with my daughter; Judge Lewis’s new order violated my civil right to religion and ommitted school breaks. By omitting school breaks in the order I am not allowed any/zero time with my daughter during the breaks, because the Petitioners attorneys bully me to monopolize all of my daughters time (i.e. if its not defined it is the Petitioners time by default) - it will take another evaluator to tell Judge Lewis this is wrong (cost of the 2nd evaluator - over $30,000). Both evaluators recommend custody exchanges be fair and in the best interest of or daughter; however, Judge Lewis ignores their recommendation to significantly penalize me and I am burdened with 3/4 of the driving on exchanges (the evaluator took custody out of his hands, so he had to find something punish me - I will share details soon which demonstrate he intentionally ignores the best interest of our daughter just to be a jerk towards me).
Click Here for the Order violating my First Amendment Rights - giving Petitioner any control over an activity completely eliminates that activity between my daughter and I. Judge Lewis acknowledged many times prior to the order, the Petitioner is contentious over absolutely everything (she even requested an order which would keep me from taking my daughter hiking - an activity we both love).
2011 Child Support – Judge Lewis’s child support order understates my income significantly does not report my child support costs and omits other expense which significantly overstates my child support payments. In spite of irrefutable data (MY W2s and 2010 TAXES), he accepts opposing counsels inaccurate information/data (their fictitious dissomaster). The order also hammers with me an excessive arrears payment; however, had income/costs been accurately reflected the Petitioner would actually owe me. Soon, I will share excerpts of the transcript which are alarming.
WIP...More to come
2011 Custody Mediation – The Petitioner is an hour late. After the Petitioner met with the custody mediator, the mediator explained to me there will be not opportunity to reach a custody settlement with the Petitioner. The mediator advised me to read the book “Joint Custody with a Jerk” - http://www.amazon.com/Joint-Custody-Jerk-Uncooperative-Hands/dp/0312584202 I plead to the mediator for help and she states the only thing she can do for me is recommend an evaluation (checking a box). ADR has virtual no influence in the court, only a judge can decide your children’s fate - someone with no professional child, or family training.
2011 Evaluation – No shock, Judge Lewis orders the Petitioners evaluator to perform the evaluation. The evaluator reviews Judge Lewis’s order and finds the order absurd and modifies the order to provide my family and I reasonable time with my daughter.
2011 New Custody Order – Judge Lewis accepts most of the evaluators custody recommendations even though they were similar to my 2010 custody request for modification (see 2010 timeline) – the request he denied. Although I finally had weekends and 3 day holidays with my daughter; Judge Lewis’s new order violated my civil right to religion and ommitted school breaks. By omitting school breaks in the order I am not allowed any/zero time with my daughter during the breaks, because the Petitioners attorneys bully me to monopolize all of my daughters time (i.e. if its not defined it is the Petitioners time by default) - it will take another evaluator to tell Judge Lewis this is wrong (cost of the 2nd evaluator - over $30,000). Both evaluators recommend custody exchanges be fair and in the best interest of or daughter; however, Judge Lewis ignores their recommendation to significantly penalize me and I am burdened with 3/4 of the driving on exchanges (the evaluator took custody out of his hands, so he had to find something punish me - I will share details soon which demonstrate he intentionally ignores the best interest of our daughter just to be a jerk towards me).
Click Here for the Order violating my First Amendment Rights - giving Petitioner any control over an activity completely eliminates that activity between my daughter and I. Judge Lewis acknowledged many times prior to the order, the Petitioner is contentious over absolutely everything (she even requested an order which would keep me from taking my daughter hiking - an activity we both love).
2011 Child Support – Judge Lewis’s child support order understates my income significantly does not report my child support costs and omits other expense which significantly overstates my child support payments. In spite of irrefutable data (MY W2s and 2010 TAXES), he accepts opposing counsels inaccurate information/data (their fictitious dissomaster). The order also hammers with me an excessive arrears payment; however, had income/costs been accurately reflected the Petitioner would actually owe me. Soon, I will share excerpts of the transcript which are alarming.
WIP...More to come
1st_amendment_redact.pdf | |
File Size: | 149 kb |
File Type: |