***Pet - Petitioner; Res - Respondent
Click Here for a high-level chronology of my case which is profiled on the Our Family Law website.
2012 Mediation – Legally details discussed during mediation cannot be disclosed; however, it is important to note the opposing counsel acknowledges his conduct was a detriment to a successful mediation.
2012 Settlement – Res agrees to settlement with the Pet; however, through deceptive legalese Res learns Pet attorney has reduced their settlement to half the agreed amount…settlement is halted as a result. Much more to provide here…
2012 Requests for Attorneys – Rather than work towards a compromise to reach settlement the Pet becomes a further impediment to settlement (even declining her initial settlement terms). With settlement off the table, Res request to have an attorney represent him for the property and assets trial - the opposing counsel challenges the requests and is successful - TWICE. On Res second request, his attorney (one of the most seasoned attorney’s in LA) provides a declaration explaining why he needs adequate time to put on a case. If a seasoned attorney cannot put on a case in the time required, a Pro Per cannot be expected to put on his case in less time right??...WRONG, the court forced Res to trail in less time than what a seasoned attorney required and without any documentation, or exhibits!
...As you will see throughout the history of this case common logic is never the rule. Google: *“Right to Counsel” - a movement gaining momentum to provide counsel to those in need. Do we need another movement in relation to this case? - "Allow Counsel", "Don't Block Counsel"? Res had counsel, but the court would not allow his counsel time to put on a case...IMPORTANT NOTE –the judgment was not confirmed until a year after the trial; therefore, there was more than sufficient time to “level the playing field”.
2012 Trial – Res attorney withdrew from the case reciting the Attorney Code of Ethics as reason for his withdrawal (i.e. he would put Res at risk, because he could not adequately represent Res with the courts rush to trial) – You will learn the "Judicial" Code of Ethics is governed by a much lower moral standard. You can imagine Res extreme duress and anxiety of having to now represent himself in a complex financial trial with extremely limited legal knowledge and with no/zero resources to help him; while at the same time burdened with a complex escrow on the community home - by himself (Pet stopped working with Res on absolutely everything after she filed for divorce). In addition, during trial Res had to pack, find a new place to live (then actually move) and hold down a job while attending more than 10 trial dates in Los Angeles far from his San Diego home - When Pet asked to miss trial dates, so it would not impact her vacation - Judge Lewis sympathetically granted her the time away from court (she missed 1/2 of the court appearances!). There would be no sympathy for Res, if Res circumstances were not overwhelming enough…IT GOT MUCH WORSE (more details provided soon).
Please Click Here for further alarming details which Res provided in a declaration. Res wrote the declaration for another Judge Lewis target of retaliation (who remains anonymous), so they could demonstrate a similar pattern in their case. Through this site, several people have indicated Judge Lewis doctors transcripts when court documents go missing...see similar tampering in Orange County - http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-grand-jury-oc-courthouse-tampering-20150630-story.html
The court literally could not have put Res in a greater position to fail -The outcome was predictable...
2012/2013 Judgment Revisions – Judge Lewis’s initial judgment (order #1) looked nothing like the final order (order #2) – why? Opposing counsel practically re-wrote the judgment/order on objection after receiving Judge Lewis's order (Judge Lewis literally gave them a blank check to write their own order - order #2). Judge Lewis had set a hearing date for both parties to represent their objections; however, he later revoked the hearing and accepted nearly all of opposing counsels numerous objections –which obviously resulted in a significant financial variance in Petitioners favor (imagine you get to write your own order!!) - Res challenges anyone (any judge, attorney...anyone period) to explain the discrepancies between judge Lewis's order #1 and the final order #2 opposing counsel prepared. It's no coincidence the timing coincides with - #1 The judicial tax fraud issue is elevated; #2 The 2nd District Court disqualification in the civil case.
2012/2013 Property and Assets Judgment – The judgment was worse case (not a shock?). There was an approx. $200,000 deviation in Petitioners favor above the baseline established during financial mediation (mediation is meant to be consistent with how a judge would rule). Besides grossly awarding the Pet, Judge Lewis froze Res assets (only Res assets) to ensure he would not have representation at future trials. FOUR additional trials would ensue through 2015…all 4 would be increasingly devastating until leaving Res with excessive debt and less time with his daughter. Indisputable Fact: The Res financial devastation was a direct result of the egregious imbalance in legal representation - Had there been a balance in legal representation: #1 The Pet counsel would not have wrote their own order/judgment; #2 Res assets would not have been the only assets frozen; #3 Res would not have been buried in debtors prison which he can never escape.
Before Judge Lewis, Res working relationship and co-parenting with the Pet was excellent. Also, he held properties and $300,000+ in separate assets. After Judge Lewis got through with him, he was stripped of all property/assets and was reaching $300,000 in debt. To cope with Petitioners highly contentious post-divorce behavior, Res follows the custody mediator’s advice and frequently references the book “Joint Custody with a Jerk”. To cope with the physiological terror and devastation of this divorce, Res is on anti-depressants and requires unsafe levels of sleep medication to subside the night terrors and anxiety disorder which he developed during this divorce from hell.
PRO PER/THE MAJORITY YOU ARE NOT WELCOME - THIS IS A SYSTEM RUN BY ATTORNEYS FOR ATTORNEYS, BELOW ARE A FEW EXAMPLES OF THE INJUSTICE SYSTEM WHICH I EXPERIENCED REPRESENTING MYSELF ....
COMMUNITY ASSETS - It is the law to disclose community assets (as defined by the letter of the law). I disclosed mine like an idiot, which left them exposed for the taking, including my *separate property (several $100,000's all gone). The Pet has never disclosed her community assets in spite of the law, and in spite of her attorneys "written" agreement to provide the account statements of the shared accounts only she had access to. If Judge Lewis likes you, all you have to say is "I closed them during marriage" (bam! all the money is yours) - even if during trial you commit perjury and slip-up and later admit in testimony a couple accounts remained open after the divorce (as the Pet did).
*Separate property is extremely ambiguous in CA which allows Judge's like Mr. Lewis to indiscriminately take separate property from those they dislike (I will provide example later). The federal law (i.e. several states are in alignment) on separate property eliminates ambiguity by using inception of title rules. The Petitioner admitted to much of my separate property; therefore, in other states I would have kept my separate property without Judge Lewis using his "discretion" to screw me.
LODGING WITH THE COURT AND SUBMITTING EVIDENCE INTO THE RECORD - If you read the declaration above you will have noted the court lost all my documentation/evidence, which I only discovered less than a month prior to trial (this is worse than you imagine - I will need to fill in the gaps later). Also, the court did not allow a MEET-AND-CONFER, which would have allowed me to vet all exhibits with opposing counsel prior to trial. As a result, when it came time to enter evidence into the record the opposing counsel easily objected to all my evidence, which Judge Lewis sustained...Although, I had irrefutable proof the evidence came from my financial institutions - opposing counsel only had to state they were not verified - How could they be verified if the court denied a legal obligation to MEET-AND-CONFER??!!
DEPOSITION & WITNESS TESTIMONY - Obviously neither of these were adequately available to me in the shortened time to trial. The one witness testimony I received was sub-par due to my lack of experience and stumbling through the many objections from an experienced opposing counsel.
SUBPOENA - If you are a Pro Per you will know how it is nearly impossible to subpoena the other parties records on your own. Subpoenas were designed for attorneys and are immensely complex for a Pro Per to attain, especially If the other party is afforded attorney's who easily can file numerous objections to block a Pro Per from ever gaining access to undisclosed community assets (as example in this case).
DISSOMASTER - Have you tried to run one? You can't, only attorneys can run one. Have you asked someone at the court to explain how the DissoMaster calculates child support? They can't. 75% of divorcee's are in Pro Per and the court wont help, or explain one of their featured tools.
From AB 590, signed into law on October 11, 2009:
"Many judicial leaders acknowledge that the disparity in outcomes is so great that indigent parties who lack representation regularly lose cases that they would win if they had counsel. A growing body of empirical research confirms the widespread perception that parties who attempt to represent themselves are likely to lose, regardless of the merits of their case, particularly when the opposing party has a lawyer, while parties represented by counsel are far more likely to prevail."
PARALEGAL - Have you tried to get legal advisement from a Paralegal? You can't, they can only help with limited documentation/forms preparation. The valuable and low cost Paralegal resources are only available to attorneys.
EMOTION - This may be our greatest weakness as a Pro Per. Many judges are extremely pedantic and easily irritated by our emotions - when I had an attorney, much of their time was spent stripping the emotion from my declarations. We are used to expressing ourselves with emotions, so it can be a tremendous challenge to be emotionless. Below is an example where our emotions may become even more exasperated....
Judge Lewis has a pet peeve about one party blaming the other party; therefore, in Pro Per how can we possibly put on a case without getting under Judge Lewis's skin (i.e. are we to state the other party is always right, give them everything)? I still don't know how to identifying the issues without pointing some of the blame at the other party - if you catch them with perjury are you blaming them?
TO SUM THINGS UP - The court would not allow my attorney the time he required to put on a case on my behalf thus forcing me into Pro Per. Once in Pro Per, there are no resources to help me and the law is so nebulous any research you do is worthless, because a judge is given excessive discretion to rule any way they want - Example: To calculate the DissoMaster, Judge Lewis took all inputs from the Pet attorney's to run a DissoMaster, because they could provide a DissoMaster reprot during trial - the court literally would not allow me to provide my own. Judge Lewis ignored my W2's and child support costs and significantly inflated my child support payments due to the fraudulent inputs the Pet attorneys provided (Income and Expenses which were not supported with evidence/statements).
2012 PET Literally Could "Get Away With Murder" - I will update the "Get Away With Murder" timeline when time permits
I attended a hearing prior to mine, the ex- wife’s brother was in jail for attempting to murder the ex-husband and the ex-wife was a suspect (as an accomplice). As a result, the ex-husband was asking for a modification of custody for his child’s safety – Judge Lewis denied the request (I don’t recall the reasoning but it was ludicrous) – all of us in court had "our jaws hit the floor" including the ex-husband who was understandably extremely distraught.
OurFamilyLaw will be partnering with the ACLU to change the behaviors of our Judges to curb "debtors prison" - Click Here for more information from the ACLU.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Click Here for a high-level chronology of my case which is profiled on the Our Family Law website.
2012 Mediation – Legally details discussed during mediation cannot be disclosed; however, it is important to note the opposing counsel acknowledges his conduct was a detriment to a successful mediation.
2012 Settlement – Res agrees to settlement with the Pet; however, through deceptive legalese Res learns Pet attorney has reduced their settlement to half the agreed amount…settlement is halted as a result. Much more to provide here…
2012 Requests for Attorneys – Rather than work towards a compromise to reach settlement the Pet becomes a further impediment to settlement (even declining her initial settlement terms). With settlement off the table, Res request to have an attorney represent him for the property and assets trial - the opposing counsel challenges the requests and is successful - TWICE. On Res second request, his attorney (one of the most seasoned attorney’s in LA) provides a declaration explaining why he needs adequate time to put on a case. If a seasoned attorney cannot put on a case in the time required, a Pro Per cannot be expected to put on his case in less time right??...WRONG, the court forced Res to trail in less time than what a seasoned attorney required and without any documentation, or exhibits!
...As you will see throughout the history of this case common logic is never the rule. Google: *“Right to Counsel” - a movement gaining momentum to provide counsel to those in need. Do we need another movement in relation to this case? - "Allow Counsel", "Don't Block Counsel"? Res had counsel, but the court would not allow his counsel time to put on a case...IMPORTANT NOTE –the judgment was not confirmed until a year after the trial; therefore, there was more than sufficient time to “level the playing field”.
2012 Trial – Res attorney withdrew from the case reciting the Attorney Code of Ethics as reason for his withdrawal (i.e. he would put Res at risk, because he could not adequately represent Res with the courts rush to trial) – You will learn the "Judicial" Code of Ethics is governed by a much lower moral standard. You can imagine Res extreme duress and anxiety of having to now represent himself in a complex financial trial with extremely limited legal knowledge and with no/zero resources to help him; while at the same time burdened with a complex escrow on the community home - by himself (Pet stopped working with Res on absolutely everything after she filed for divorce). In addition, during trial Res had to pack, find a new place to live (then actually move) and hold down a job while attending more than 10 trial dates in Los Angeles far from his San Diego home - When Pet asked to miss trial dates, so it would not impact her vacation - Judge Lewis sympathetically granted her the time away from court (she missed 1/2 of the court appearances!). There would be no sympathy for Res, if Res circumstances were not overwhelming enough…IT GOT MUCH WORSE (more details provided soon).
Please Click Here for further alarming details which Res provided in a declaration. Res wrote the declaration for another Judge Lewis target of retaliation (who remains anonymous), so they could demonstrate a similar pattern in their case. Through this site, several people have indicated Judge Lewis doctors transcripts when court documents go missing...see similar tampering in Orange County - http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-grand-jury-oc-courthouse-tampering-20150630-story.html
The court literally could not have put Res in a greater position to fail -The outcome was predictable...
2012/2013 Judgment Revisions – Judge Lewis’s initial judgment (order #1) looked nothing like the final order (order #2) – why? Opposing counsel practically re-wrote the judgment/order on objection after receiving Judge Lewis's order (Judge Lewis literally gave them a blank check to write their own order - order #2). Judge Lewis had set a hearing date for both parties to represent their objections; however, he later revoked the hearing and accepted nearly all of opposing counsels numerous objections –which obviously resulted in a significant financial variance in Petitioners favor (imagine you get to write your own order!!) - Res challenges anyone (any judge, attorney...anyone period) to explain the discrepancies between judge Lewis's order #1 and the final order #2 opposing counsel prepared. It's no coincidence the timing coincides with - #1 The judicial tax fraud issue is elevated; #2 The 2nd District Court disqualification in the civil case.
2012/2013 Property and Assets Judgment – The judgment was worse case (not a shock?). There was an approx. $200,000 deviation in Petitioners favor above the baseline established during financial mediation (mediation is meant to be consistent with how a judge would rule). Besides grossly awarding the Pet, Judge Lewis froze Res assets (only Res assets) to ensure he would not have representation at future trials. FOUR additional trials would ensue through 2015…all 4 would be increasingly devastating until leaving Res with excessive debt and less time with his daughter. Indisputable Fact: The Res financial devastation was a direct result of the egregious imbalance in legal representation - Had there been a balance in legal representation: #1 The Pet counsel would not have wrote their own order/judgment; #2 Res assets would not have been the only assets frozen; #3 Res would not have been buried in debtors prison which he can never escape.
Before Judge Lewis, Res working relationship and co-parenting with the Pet was excellent. Also, he held properties and $300,000+ in separate assets. After Judge Lewis got through with him, he was stripped of all property/assets and was reaching $300,000 in debt. To cope with Petitioners highly contentious post-divorce behavior, Res follows the custody mediator’s advice and frequently references the book “Joint Custody with a Jerk”. To cope with the physiological terror and devastation of this divorce, Res is on anti-depressants and requires unsafe levels of sleep medication to subside the night terrors and anxiety disorder which he developed during this divorce from hell.
PRO PER/THE MAJORITY YOU ARE NOT WELCOME - THIS IS A SYSTEM RUN BY ATTORNEYS FOR ATTORNEYS, BELOW ARE A FEW EXAMPLES OF THE INJUSTICE SYSTEM WHICH I EXPERIENCED REPRESENTING MYSELF ....
COMMUNITY ASSETS - It is the law to disclose community assets (as defined by the letter of the law). I disclosed mine like an idiot, which left them exposed for the taking, including my *separate property (several $100,000's all gone). The Pet has never disclosed her community assets in spite of the law, and in spite of her attorneys "written" agreement to provide the account statements of the shared accounts only she had access to. If Judge Lewis likes you, all you have to say is "I closed them during marriage" (bam! all the money is yours) - even if during trial you commit perjury and slip-up and later admit in testimony a couple accounts remained open after the divorce (as the Pet did).
*Separate property is extremely ambiguous in CA which allows Judge's like Mr. Lewis to indiscriminately take separate property from those they dislike (I will provide example later). The federal law (i.e. several states are in alignment) on separate property eliminates ambiguity by using inception of title rules. The Petitioner admitted to much of my separate property; therefore, in other states I would have kept my separate property without Judge Lewis using his "discretion" to screw me.
LODGING WITH THE COURT AND SUBMITTING EVIDENCE INTO THE RECORD - If you read the declaration above you will have noted the court lost all my documentation/evidence, which I only discovered less than a month prior to trial (this is worse than you imagine - I will need to fill in the gaps later). Also, the court did not allow a MEET-AND-CONFER, which would have allowed me to vet all exhibits with opposing counsel prior to trial. As a result, when it came time to enter evidence into the record the opposing counsel easily objected to all my evidence, which Judge Lewis sustained...Although, I had irrefutable proof the evidence came from my financial institutions - opposing counsel only had to state they were not verified - How could they be verified if the court denied a legal obligation to MEET-AND-CONFER??!!
DEPOSITION & WITNESS TESTIMONY - Obviously neither of these were adequately available to me in the shortened time to trial. The one witness testimony I received was sub-par due to my lack of experience and stumbling through the many objections from an experienced opposing counsel.
SUBPOENA - If you are a Pro Per you will know how it is nearly impossible to subpoena the other parties records on your own. Subpoenas were designed for attorneys and are immensely complex for a Pro Per to attain, especially If the other party is afforded attorney's who easily can file numerous objections to block a Pro Per from ever gaining access to undisclosed community assets (as example in this case).
DISSOMASTER - Have you tried to run one? You can't, only attorneys can run one. Have you asked someone at the court to explain how the DissoMaster calculates child support? They can't. 75% of divorcee's are in Pro Per and the court wont help, or explain one of their featured tools.
From AB 590, signed into law on October 11, 2009:
"Many judicial leaders acknowledge that the disparity in outcomes is so great that indigent parties who lack representation regularly lose cases that they would win if they had counsel. A growing body of empirical research confirms the widespread perception that parties who attempt to represent themselves are likely to lose, regardless of the merits of their case, particularly when the opposing party has a lawyer, while parties represented by counsel are far more likely to prevail."
PARALEGAL - Have you tried to get legal advisement from a Paralegal? You can't, they can only help with limited documentation/forms preparation. The valuable and low cost Paralegal resources are only available to attorneys.
EMOTION - This may be our greatest weakness as a Pro Per. Many judges are extremely pedantic and easily irritated by our emotions - when I had an attorney, much of their time was spent stripping the emotion from my declarations. We are used to expressing ourselves with emotions, so it can be a tremendous challenge to be emotionless. Below is an example where our emotions may become even more exasperated....
Judge Lewis has a pet peeve about one party blaming the other party; therefore, in Pro Per how can we possibly put on a case without getting under Judge Lewis's skin (i.e. are we to state the other party is always right, give them everything)? I still don't know how to identifying the issues without pointing some of the blame at the other party - if you catch them with perjury are you blaming them?
TO SUM THINGS UP - The court would not allow my attorney the time he required to put on a case on my behalf thus forcing me into Pro Per. Once in Pro Per, there are no resources to help me and the law is so nebulous any research you do is worthless, because a judge is given excessive discretion to rule any way they want - Example: To calculate the DissoMaster, Judge Lewis took all inputs from the Pet attorney's to run a DissoMaster, because they could provide a DissoMaster reprot during trial - the court literally would not allow me to provide my own. Judge Lewis ignored my W2's and child support costs and significantly inflated my child support payments due to the fraudulent inputs the Pet attorneys provided (Income and Expenses which were not supported with evidence/statements).
2012 PET Literally Could "Get Away With Murder" - I will update the "Get Away With Murder" timeline when time permits
I attended a hearing prior to mine, the ex- wife’s brother was in jail for attempting to murder the ex-husband and the ex-wife was a suspect (as an accomplice). As a result, the ex-husband was asking for a modification of custody for his child’s safety – Judge Lewis denied the request (I don’t recall the reasoning but it was ludicrous) – all of us in court had "our jaws hit the floor" including the ex-husband who was understandably extremely distraught.
OurFamilyLaw will be partnering with the ACLU to change the behaviors of our Judges to curb "debtors prison" - Click Here for more information from the ACLU.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Draft Content Below...
*Right to Counsel Movement (the current system - the party afforded an attorney succeeds in 75%+ of cases - it is like shooting fish in a barrel for the party afforded counsel - full details of my case will demonstrate how easy it is for the party afforded counsel to take the life of the party without counsel):
California lags far, far behind when it comes to leveling the playing field for those not afforded and attorney - in spite of the millions paid to the Elkins Task Force - http://familycourtcoalition.blogspot.com/2012/08/one-party-self-represented-in-more-than.html#more
Several right to counsel sites below...
http://www.civilrighttocounsel.org/about/staff
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_aid_indigent_defendants/initiatives/resource_center_for_access_to_justice/resources---information-on-key-atj-issues/civil_right_to_counsel1.html
http://www.legalactioncenter.org/litigation/access-counsel-dhs
http://www.justice.gov/atj/supporting-right-counsel-through-statements-interest
http://www.newsweek.com/new-york-tktk-landmark-public-defense-case-278889
http://www.mdcourts.gov/mdatjc/taskforcecivilcounsel/pdfs/finalreport201410.pdf
http://www.michbar.org/programs/righttocounsel
https://www.law.ufl.edu/_pdf/academics/centers-clinics/centers/wright.pdf
civil right to counsel, right to counsel campaign, right to counsel initiative, right to counsel movement
Koch family has been making substantial donations to criminal justice reform organizations for decades, which could explain why police reform efforts are 10 years ahead of judicial reform. The Koch family involvement in judicial reform will champion another leap forward in bringing civility to another barbaric institution - Family Law. family foundations.[5] The Koch brothers: Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch — the two brothers still with Koch Industries — are affiliated with the Koch family foundations.[5]
Beyond Political Boundaries...Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Bernie Sanders, Carly Fiorina and others - Who is partnering for change?
ourfamilywizard, child alienation, Family, Law, Superior Court, Corruption, Constitutional Rights, Liberty Rights, Parental Rights, Winner takes all, Due Process, Fraud, Vexatious Litigant, Family Law Appeals, Divorce Corp, Father's Rights, Non-Custodial Parent, Joint Custody, Legal Abuse, Legal Abuse Syndrome, Power and Control, Domestic Violence, HAP, Hostile Agressive Parent, Children's Rights, Parental Alienation, Disqualification of Attorney, Judicial Abuse, due process, jurisdiction, Family courts, 14th amendment
.
*Right to Counsel Movement (the current system - the party afforded an attorney succeeds in 75%+ of cases - it is like shooting fish in a barrel for the party afforded counsel - full details of my case will demonstrate how easy it is for the party afforded counsel to take the life of the party without counsel):
California lags far, far behind when it comes to leveling the playing field for those not afforded and attorney - in spite of the millions paid to the Elkins Task Force - http://familycourtcoalition.blogspot.com/2012/08/one-party-self-represented-in-more-than.html#more
Several right to counsel sites below...
http://www.civilrighttocounsel.org/about/staff
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_aid_indigent_defendants/initiatives/resource_center_for_access_to_justice/resources---information-on-key-atj-issues/civil_right_to_counsel1.html
http://www.legalactioncenter.org/litigation/access-counsel-dhs
http://www.justice.gov/atj/supporting-right-counsel-through-statements-interest
http://www.newsweek.com/new-york-tktk-landmark-public-defense-case-278889
http://www.mdcourts.gov/mdatjc/taskforcecivilcounsel/pdfs/finalreport201410.pdf
http://www.michbar.org/programs/righttocounsel
https://www.law.ufl.edu/_pdf/academics/centers-clinics/centers/wright.pdf
civil right to counsel, right to counsel campaign, right to counsel initiative, right to counsel movement
Koch family has been making substantial donations to criminal justice reform organizations for decades, which could explain why police reform efforts are 10 years ahead of judicial reform. The Koch family involvement in judicial reform will champion another leap forward in bringing civility to another barbaric institution - Family Law. family foundations.[5] The Koch brothers: Charles G. Koch and David H. Koch — the two brothers still with Koch Industries — are affiliated with the Koch family foundations.[5]
Beyond Political Boundaries...Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Bernie Sanders, Carly Fiorina and others - Who is partnering for change?
ourfamilywizard, child alienation, Family, Law, Superior Court, Corruption, Constitutional Rights, Liberty Rights, Parental Rights, Winner takes all, Due Process, Fraud, Vexatious Litigant, Family Law Appeals, Divorce Corp, Father's Rights, Non-Custodial Parent, Joint Custody, Legal Abuse, Legal Abuse Syndrome, Power and Control, Domestic Violence, HAP, Hostile Agressive Parent, Children's Rights, Parental Alienation, Disqualification of Attorney, Judicial Abuse, due process, jurisdiction, Family courts, 14th amendment
.
testimony_redact.pdf | |
File Size: | 1277 kb |
File Type: |